Potassium argon dating half life

How do they know the decay rate has been the same for millions or billions of years? A portion of this sample was crushed, sieved, and processed into a whole rock powder as well as four mineral concentrates. " Design Science Association, retrieved Dec 19, 2012, [ See also Hans-Joachim Zillmer, Volcanic (igneous) rock, according to evolutionists, is the best way to date ages with K-Ar dating because, theoretically, when a volcano erupts, all the argon gas is released from the rock, and resets the clock back to zero.

To put it bluntly, the evolutionists have no clue, but "In June of 1992, Dr. -Keith Swenson, author who went on the expedition to gather igneous rock with Dr. This all sounds good in theory, but in practice, like with the rock in Mount St.

A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren." Proverbs -19 In "The Carbon Dating Game," we covered flaws, assumptions, and cherry-picking in dating methods that are said to be used for up to 50,000 years, which many evolutionists still use to say the dates of the Bible incorrect.

In this article, we will be going over potassium-argon dating (K-Ar) to explain the flaws, assumptions, and cherry-picking in dating methods that are said to be used in dating billions of years, and according to most evolutionists, "proof" of an old-earth.

The average person can see a serious problem with the circular reasoning and the non-existance the geologic column is built on, so to hide the obvious, evolutionists throw a cloth over it called radiometric dating, claiming it is using the scientific method to get ages of billions of years, but it is nothing more than slight-of-hand falsely called science.

Helens, which erupted 30 years ago: They throw out an age they get if it doesn't line up with their geologic column, or more simply put, they throw out a date they get if it doesn't line up with how old they already think it is!

Let's say an evolutionist gets radiometric dates of an object, and the lab will pull back all sorts of wild numbers, lets say ranging from .5 million, all the way up to 200 million, but they realize there is a fossil of a trilobyte (dated at 500 million; way up from .5 or 200) in the sample of what they are dating, so they will date it again and again, until they get a number that goes above 500 million to match with the fossil they found.

They We now have a 500% margin of error between 0.5 to 2.5 million years from volcanic rock that was originally "known" by the evolutionists to be over 200 millio years old. I'm amazed at the extraordinary faith so many evolutionists have to trust in the assumptions of a few men running around claiming they know the age of the earth based on the scientific method -- this is a joke, and a slap in the face, to those who do real scientific research.

These same problems appear in all dating methods across the board.

Leave a Reply